Corporate Group Insurance for Global Employees
Understand the importance of global employee insurance in safeguarding your workforce’s health, travel, and your company’s overall liability exposure.
International medical cover for expats and their families.
Medical and trip cancellation coverage for international travel.
Life insurance for globally mobile individuals living or working abroad.
Comprehensive benefits for international teams.
Insights on international relocation and global mobility.
Download our brochures or follow us on socials.
Most Popular Country Guides
Healthcare, insurance, and living insights to plan life and travel in each destination.
Healthcare, safety, and practical guidance for living abroad.
Tips and guidance for safer, smarter international travel.
Resources for global mobility, HR, and international teams.
Popular and recently published guides from our team.
Learn how HR and mobility leaders can respond to H-1B visa disruption, protect international employees, and build a more resilient global hiring strategy.
Recent changes involving the H-1B visa have created uncertainty for global HR and mobility teams. A $100,000 payment requirement remains in dispute following several court rulings, and an appeal is ongoing. This situation shows how quickly visa rules can change. For employers, it highlights the importance of risk management, contingency planning, and current legal guidance.
In September 2025, a presidential proclamation introduced a $100,000 payment requirement for certain H-1B petitions. The proclamation focused mainly on certain petitions for workers outside the United States. This included some workers who needed to apply for a visa at a U.S. embassy or consulate before entering the country. The payment was a one-time requirement connected with covered petitions. It was not an annual fee, and it did not apply to every new H-1B petition or visa application.
The distinction between a petition and a visa application is also important. An employer generally files an H-1B petition with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. After USCIS approves the petition, a worker outside the U.S. may need to apply for a visa through the Department of State.
The legal position has changed since the proclamation was issued. On June 8, 2026, a federal district court vacated the agency policy that implemented the payment requirement. The government appealed. But on July 24, 2026, the First Circuit refused to keep the policy in effect during the appeal.
As of August 3, 2026, the implementing policy remains vacated. However, the appeal is ongoing, and further legal or administrative changes remain possible.
Employers should not rely on outdated summaries or single-agency pages when planning an H-1B filing. USCIS materials have not consistently reflected the latest court developments. Before filing a petition or making an employment decision, organizations should confirm the current requirements with qualified immigration counsel.
Even companies that do not sponsor H-1B workers may feel the effects of changing visa rules. Sudden changes can disrupt hiring budgets, start dates, salary expectations, international travel, and long-term workforce planning.
International assignments and cross-border hires are not guaranteed pathways. A policy announcement, agency directive, or court ruling can delay an employee’s start date. It may also raise costs or disrupt a key project.
Mobility leaders should include visa planning as part of their broader plans for managing business risk and disruption. This approach includes:
Employers can take the following four steps to reduce visa-related risk and create a more flexible global mobility strategy.
When relocation becomes difficult, expensive, or uncertain, consider whether the employee needs to move at all.
An Employer of Record, or EOR, can legally employ a worker in the country where that person lives. The EOR can manage payroll, ensure compliance, and arrange global group benefits. This lets organizations hire international talent without needing to sponsor a U.S. visa.
An EOR arrangement is not suitable for every situation. Companies should review employment, tax, intellectual property, and worker classification risks before selecting this model.
Navigating Global Mobility
Check out our latest newsletter to get clear guidance on contractors, EORs, and entity setup so you can select the global hiring model that fits your team’s growth.
Avoid assuming that every international role requires permanent relocation. Instead, develop several options for filling positions and completing projects.
These options may include:
A flexible mix of hiring models can help the organization respond when one visa route becomes unavailable or uncertain.
Immigration uncertainty requires more lead time and more frequent review.
Start planning early. Prepare documents ahead of time. Keep a rolling forecast of employees who might need immigration support over the next 6 to 12 months. Employers should set up internal alerts for:
Before an employee travels or a petition is filed, confirm that the organization is following current guidance. An older government webpage or news report may no longer reflect the legal position.
Global Mobility
Visa uncertainty can place considerable stress on employees and their families. Delays may affect housing, school enrollment, travel, healthcare, and a spouse’s ability to work. Strong family support can therefore play an important role in a successful expat assignment.
Clear communication is essential. Explain what is known, identify what remains uncertain, and avoid promising an outcome the organization cannot control.
To support affected employees:
From an insurance standpoint, visa uncertainty can increase the risk of assignment disruption, including trip cancellations, delayed start dates, or emergency repatriations.
International health and travel coverage should be able to adapt when an employee’s destination or travel plans change.
Planning for these contingencies can help protect employee well-being and minimize business disruption.
Immigration status is more than an administrative issue. It plays an important role in supporting a global workforce.
The H-1B visa payment dispute shows how quickly a policy can be announced, implemented, challenged, paused, and vacated. Employers that depend on a single visa route may have little time to respond when conditions change.
Organizations with diverse talent pipelines, strong compliance processes, and flexible mobility programs will be better prepared to manage this uncertainty.
Employers should now:
Stay ahead of global mobility change. Subscribe to our Navigating Global Mobility Newsletter. Get monthly updates on compliance, employee benefits, and tips to protect your global workforce.
No. As of August 3, 2026, the agency policy implementing the $100,000 H-1B payment remains vacated. The government’s appeal is ongoing, so employers should confirm the current position before filing.
Yes. The government is appealing the ruling that vacated the implementing policy. Future court decisions or new government action could change the requirements, so employers should continue monitoring the case.
The payment requirement applied to certain H-1B petitions, primarily involving workers outside the United States and some seeking visas through a U.S. embassy or consulate. It did not cover every H-1B petition or visa application.
No. The $100,000 H-1B payment was a one-time requirement connected with certain covered petitions. It was not a recurring annual charge.
An employer files an H-1B petition with USCIS. After approval, a worker outside the United States may need to submit a separate visa application through the Department of State before entering the country.
Employers should check current court decisions and agency guidance, consult qualified immigration counsel, and prepare alternative hiring or assignment plans in case the requirements change.
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not provide legal or immigration advice. Immigration policies and court proceedings can change quickly. Speak with a qualified immigration lawyer before making decisions about an employee, petition, or assignment.